Tool Comparison · 2026
Both tools interact with Figma and HTML — but in opposite directions. Here's the honest breakdown of what each tool actually does, who it's for, and when to use each.
Direct Answer
html2design and Anima solve opposite problems. html2design converts HTML and CSS code into native, editable Figma layers (code → design). Anima converts Figma designs into production-ready React or HTML code (design → code). If you need to import existing HTML into Figma, html2design is the right tool. If you need to generate code from a Figma file, Anima is for you.
html2design
Paste raw HTML/CSS into Figma. Gets you native Figma frames, text, fills — not screenshots. Works on localhost, behind auth, or from any source you can copy from DevTools.
Anima
Primarily a Figma → Code tool. Generates React, HTML/CSS, or Vue from your Figma design files. Also offers some screen-capture import from live URLs, but that is not its core strength.
Every row is based on publicly documented capabilities as of 2026.
| Feature | html2design | Anima |
|---|---|---|
| Workflow Direction | ||
| Primary direction | Code → Figma | Figma → Code |
| Import HTML/CSS into Figma | ✓ | Not primary purpose |
| Export Figma designs to code | ✗ | ✓ |
| HTML Import Capabilities | ||
| Accepts pasted HTML/CSS | ✓ | ✗ |
| Works with localhost / dev server | ✓ | ✗ |
| Works behind authentication | ✓ | ✗ |
| Import from live public URL | Via pasted HTML | Screen capture |
| Figma Output Quality | ||
| Produces native Figma layers | ✓ | Not applicable |
| Flexbox layout preserved | ✓ | ✗ |
| Typography preserved (font, size, weight) | ✓ | ✗ |
| Fully editable text layers in Figma | ✓ | ✗ |
| Setup & Access | ||
| Requires Chrome extension | ✗ | ✗ |
| Native Figma plugin | ✓ | ✓ |
| Figma Community install | ✓ | ✓ |
| Pricing | ||
| Pricing transparency | $12/mo · $96/yr | Free + paid from ~$36/mo |
| Unlimited HTML imports | ✓ | N/A — different use case |
✓ = fully supported | ✗ = not supported | "N/A" = not applicable to this tool's purpose
An honest assessment of each tool's strengths and limitations.
html2design
Strengths
Limitations
Anima
Strengths
Limitations
The right choice depends entirely on your workflow direction.
Use html2design when…
Use Anima when…
Can I use both?
Yes — they complement each other in full-cycle workflows. Use html2design to bring existing HTML/CSS into Figma for design review or migration. Use Anima to generate code from the updated Figma designs after the design iteration.
localhost:3000, a Storybook story, or any component you can copy from your browser's DevTools — even if it's behind authentication.
flex-direction, align-items, justify-content, gap, and padding are reflected in the spatial layout of the generated frames. The result is a Figma layer tree you can iterate on — not a flat image.
Install HTML to Figma from the Figma Community and convert your first HTML/CSS in under 2 minutes.
Install Free on Figma CommunityFree to try · $12/mo to unlock all features
Want the full picture? Read the Complete Guide to HTML to Figma Conversion →
See all comparisons at the Compare hub →