Tool Comparison · 2026

html2design
vs html.to.design

Both tools bring HTML into Figma — but they use completely different approaches. One requires a Chrome extension and a live URL. The other accepts pasted code and works anywhere.

Direct Answer

html2design and html.to.design both convert HTML to Figma layers, but they work differently. html2design is a native Figma plugin: you paste HTML and CSS directly, no Chrome extension needed, and it works with localhost, Storybook, and private dev builds. html.to.design is a Chrome extension that captures a live website from your browser tab. For code-first workflows and component-level imports, html2design gives you more control and cleaner editable layers.

TL;DR — Pick Your Tool

Paste HTML

html2design

Paste code.
Get editable layers.

Native Figma plugin. Paste HTML and CSS from anywhere — DevTools, code editor, Storybook, localhost — and get native Figma frames, editable text, and preserved Flexbox layouts. No browser extension required.

  • ✓ No Chrome extension
  • ✓ Works with localhost & dev builds
  • ✓ Editable layers, not screenshots
  • ✓ $12/mo or $96/yr
Install from Figma Community →

html.to.design

Capture browser tab.
Import to Figma.

Chrome extension that captures the current browser tab and imports it into Figma. Good for quickly grabbing a live public webpage, but requires Chrome, a live URL, and produces results that depend on the rendered page state.

  • ✗ Requires Chrome extension
  • ✗ Needs live, accessible URL
  • ✗ Can't paste localhost code directly
  • ~ Free tier + paid plans

Feature-by-feature breakdown

Every row is based on publicly documented capabilities as of 2026.

Feature html2design html.to.design
Input Method
Accepts pasted HTML/CSS code ✓ ✗
Captures live browser tab Via pasted HTML ✓
Requires Chrome extension ✗ ✓
Works with localhost / dev server ✓ Limited
Works behind authentication ✓ ✗
Import from Storybook / component library ✓ If public URL
Figma Output Quality
Produces native Figma layers ✓ ✓
Fully editable text layers ✓ Varies by page
Flexbox layout preserved ✓ Partial
Typography preserved (font, size, weight) ✓ Partial
Setup & Access
Native Figma plugin ✓ Plugin + Chrome ext
Figma Community install ✓ ✓
Works in any browser (not just Chrome) ✓ ✗
Pricing
Pricing model $12/mo · $96/yr Free tier + paid plans
Unlimited imports on paid plan ✓ Plan-dependent

✓ = fully supported  |  ✗ = not supported  |  "Partial" or "Varies" = limited support

Pros & Cons

An honest assessment of each tool's strengths and limitations.

html2design

Strengths

  • ✓ Paste-based input — works with any HTML source, no live URL required
  • ✓ No Chrome extension needed — works in Figma Desktop, Arc, Safari, any browser
  • ✓ Full localhost and behind-auth support for dev builds and Storybook
  • ✓ Flexbox layout fidelity — spatial relationships preserved from computed CSS
  • ✓ Transparent flat-rate pricing with unlimited imports

Limitations

  • — Requires copying HTML/CSS manually from DevTools or code editor
  • — CSS animations are not replicated in Figma

html.to.design

Strengths

  • ✓ One-click import of any live public webpage from Chrome
  • ✓ Good for quickly snapshotting a full marketing page or landing page
  • ✓ Free tier available for light use

Limitations

  • — Requires Chrome browser and separate extension install
  • — Cannot import code directly — needs a publicly accessible URL
  • — Complex pages can produce flattened or less-editable layer trees
  • — Not suitable for localhost, Storybook, or behind-auth content

When to use each tool

The right choice depends on where your HTML lives and how you work.

Use html2design when…

  • You have HTML/CSS and want editable Figma layers from your code
  • You're working on localhost or a local dev server
  • You're importing a component from Storybook or a component library
  • Your page is behind authentication or not publicly accessible
  • You use Figma Desktop, Arc, or any browser other than Chrome
  • You're doing a developer handoff audit or legacy migration

Use html.to.design when…

  • You want to quickly snapshot a live public website from Chrome with one click
  • You're capturing a competitor's page or a reference design for inspiration
  • You don't have access to the source code of the page you want to import
  • You're already in Chrome and prefer a browser-native extension workflow

Can I use both?

Yes. html2design is better for your own code; html.to.design is better for capturing live sites you don't have code access to. For any work involving a codebase, component library, or dev server, html2design gives you more control and cleaner results.

Frequently asked questions

What is the difference between html2design and html.to.design? ↓
Both tools import HTML into Figma, but they work differently. html2design is a native Figma plugin: you paste HTML and CSS directly, no Chrome extension needed, and it works with localhost, Storybook, and private dev builds. html.to.design is a Chrome extension that captures a live website from your browser tab. For code-first workflows and component-level imports, html2design gives you more control and cleaner editable layers.
Does html.to.design work with localhost? ↓
html.to.design relies on a Chrome extension that captures the currently open browser tab. While you can open a localhost page in Chrome, extension access to local environments is limited by browser security policies. html2design has no such limitation — you paste HTML and CSS code directly into the plugin, so localhost, dev builds, and behind-auth pages work without restriction.
Do I need a Chrome extension to use html2design? ↓
No. html2design is a native Figma plugin installed once from the Figma Community. There is no Chrome extension required. You copy HTML and CSS from your source and paste it directly into the plugin interface inside Figma. html.to.design, by contrast, requires Chrome and a separate browser extension install.
Which tool produces better Figma output? ↓
html2design processes the HTML and CSS you paste and converts it into native Figma layers: editable text nodes, properly named frames, fills from computed styles, and Flexbox-based spatial layout. html.to.design captures the rendered page from a browser tab, which can result in flatter layer trees for complex pages. For component and design system work, html2design's code-first approach typically yields cleaner, more editable results.
How does html2design pricing compare to html.to.design? ↓
html2design charges $12/month or $96/year for unlimited HTML imports with full feature access. html.to.design has a free tier with limitations and paid plans at higher price points. html2design's flat per-user pricing is more predictable for individual designers and small teams doing frequent imports.
Can html2design replace html.to.design? ↓
For most HTML-to-Figma workflows, yes. html2design covers the core use case without a Chrome extension or live URL. If you were using html.to.design specifically to one-click capture a live page you don't have code access to, you'd need to copy the HTML manually. For everything involving a codebase, component library, or dev server, html2design is the more capable replacement.

Explore more comparisons & guides

Compare Hub

All HTML to Figma Comparisons

Comparison

html2design vs Screenshot Tools

Comparison

html2design vs Anima

Comparison

html2design vs Zeplin

Guide

Complete HTML to Figma Guide

Blog

Top 5 HTML to Figma Tools Compared

Ready to import HTML into Figma?

Install HTML to Figma from the Figma Community and convert your first HTML/CSS in under 2 minutes.

Install Free on Figma Community

Free to try · $12/mo to unlock all features

Want the full picture? Read the Complete Guide to HTML to Figma Conversion →

See all comparisons at the Compare hub →